Tungsten vs Lead – Which is Better?

tungsten vs lead

Radiation can serve a useful purpose. It is significant in fields like clinical diagnostics and therapies or power manufacturing. Radiation can, however, be unsafe to our bodies in the event that we have exposure to it in high amounts. It can lead to tumour growth and harm our cells. To protect ourselves from the negative impacts of radiation, we should have proper protection – like lead or tungsten radiation shielding.

Tungsten vs Lead – What is a Better Shielding Option?

While considering choices for radiation shielding, the main thing is to utilize materials with a high density. Lead and tungsten are the most well-known materials to protect from gamma radiation. Both of them have multiple benefits.

Let us compare tungsten vs lead materials and take look at both of them in detail.

Tungsten Shielding

Can tungsten protect against radiation? That’s a question everyone asks. So what is tungsten radiation shielding? Tungsten has a thickness that is roughly 1.7 times higher than lead. It gives a more serious level of protection.

It is a reasonable choice for applications where lead is definitely not a possible choice, including for size reduction, and expanding tungsten vs lead weight in huge or little depressions for radiation shielding. It is solid and deeply adjustable into accurate parts.

Tungsten is the primary decision for clinical and modern settings that require radiation shielding. It utilizes less material than lead to give a similar degree of ingestion.

A fantastic material for shielding, tungsten ensures the least radiation exposure and guarantees ALARA objectives in the work environment.

Machinability, radiographic density, strength, low harmfulness, and heat obstruction take into consideration superior design flexibility versus other shielding materials.

Lead Shielding

Lead has various applications. It is generally useful in atomic power, atomic medication, analytic imaging and non-hazardous testing for radiation assurance and shielding.

Tungsten is one of the most adaptable types of shielding materials that is helpful to defeat challenges like restrictions on space, cost, and installation related to planning and building radiation shielding.

Compared with other materials, like tungsten nuclear shielding products, lead is more affordable. It is also effective, accessible, and simple to process into final radiation shielding products.

Lead is extremely viable at shielding x-beam and gamma radiation. In view of the density of lead, its high nuclear number, and stable isotopes, lead is great for stopping gamma and x-beam radiation.

For a gamma beam from a Cobalt-60 source, unadulterated lead has a Half-Value Layer (HVL – the thickness of shielding expected to decrease the degree of radiation by half) of roughly 12.5 mm (0.49 in).

A lead shield will be more slender than a steel (21.6 HVL) or concrete (60.5 HVL) shield of similar viability in protecting a Co60 source. From an x-beam source with a pinnacle voltage of 200 kV, the HVL of lead would be 0.52 mm (0.021 in).

Can tungsten protect against radiation?

Now that we know what is tungsten shielding, let us understand if it can protect against radiation and why we should pick it over the lead.

The tungsten powder is regularly compounded with elastic or plastic to form it into various shapes. A usual clinical application is the covers and vests worn when you have an X-beam taken at a specialist or dental specialist’s office. The tungsten nuclear shielding products assist in radiation shielding for power generation applications like atomic reactors.

Tungsten will also help with shielding the lines that race to and from the reactor. These products are generally of lead, yet the harmfulness of lead makes the shielding removal costly. With a higher density, more slender and less cumbersome tungsten radiation shielding, products are easily available.

The advantages of tungsten shielding are:

  • High radiation weakening.
  • Simple to keep clean and sanitize.
  • Non-Toxic material.
  • Correspondingly steady up to 1000 *c.
  • Hard and Durable (no requirement for steel or plastic covering).

Final thoughts

Because of the mix of high density, machinability, great erosion obstruction and high radiation assimilation ability (better than lead and steel) and high strength, tungsten radiation shielding is much better than lead.

Tungsten actually has a similar radiation protecting capacity as a lead in any event, in terms of volume and tungsten density vs lead. Furthermore, against lead and uranium, a high-density tungsten combination is all the more harmless to the ecosystem because of its non-poisonous and contamination-free properties.

Tungsten is also often known as lead-free shielding. It comprises a high amount of the market. A few examples of lead-free radiation shielding are available with companies like Agescan International Inc. Assuming you make any sort of lead-free radiation shielding products, AgescanTungsten.com a specialty materials company can supply the tungsten materials that you really want.

People also viewed:

Chilled Beams and Induction Units

Best Industrial Vacuums for Commercial Use